I begin by apologising to many people who for the last few months have had to put up with my erratic and at times rude behaviour, I now acknowledge that I was becoming a miserable old sod, but perhaps now in light of the truth being revealed it will be seen as all with good reason?. It all stems from my role as a County Councillor and opposition to all things Tory at County Hall. Opposition is never welcomed and I remember myself in Parliament castigating the Tory benches when first elected for seeming to oppose for oppositions sake. This was before I realised that a) they were simply doing their job and b) good opposition aslo makes good government.
So I therefore make no excuses for being a thorn in the side of my political opponents, however for the past few months I had detected a sense of disaffiliation with some officers on the Council and a growing impression that they had simply decided en-masse as a collective group to ignore me. To say "stuff Tony Clarke and his opinionated comments and requests he can go toot"
I found myself arguing more often with officers over them not carrying out the simplest of tasks requested, for repeatedly asking for my opinion on the same matters even if I had already passed judgement on them before. And for ringing me up at all hours of the day enquiring as to matters I had already dealt with. All this coupled with the discovery that at the age of 48 reading glasses were to be the order of the day, it led me to believe I was getting far too old far too quickly. Perhaps I hadn't sent that reply back to whoever it was, and maybe the comments on consultations and reviews which had pondered over stayed inside my own head and were not as I thought shared with others? Constituency case work was also getting harder to deal with, people never got back to me with any answers and I would then have to chase officers up over every emailed request with a phone call or personal visit to ensure that any action was taken.
So was I losing the plot? or had I overstepped the mark, burnt all my bridges and been ex communicated?
The very last straw came in the guise of a petty standards board complaint which had been made by a Tory Backbench Cllr who I have never spoken to in person and has in fact as far as I am aware never even spoken himself in the chamber since being elected. He had taken offence as to something written on this blog. I doubt it was even him behind the complaint, he was probably the Tories stool pigeon sent out to fire a warning shot across my bow for repeatedly upsetting the boss. The investigating officer kept asking me to attend for interview, and I kept replying saying I had better things to do with my time and if they really wanted to make a case then they should just go ahead and do it. I did however point them in the direction of precedent and high court rulings which made the complaint non enforceable. I also told them that I looked forward to defending my position in the public realm once concluded
To my anger I got a draft report sent to me a) saying I hadn't bothered to reply to any requests made by the officer and b) finding me in breach of something I couldn't possibly have done. So I fired off a pretty forceful response, which basically asked the investigator to remove the untruths and think again on the judgement in light of the clear evidence. The response? A final report unchanged and still full of holes and wrongful judgements and decisions. Perhaps it was time I called it a day I thought, after all do I really need all this hassle?
But in a final attempt to rescue my sanity I asked the Chief Executive why he hadn't even responded or intervened in the matter having been copied in to all the correspondence. "I never received them" he said? You must of done I replied and I showed him the "delivered" notes in my ipad version of the email sent box. Still no joy. So he sent me a test email, which I received and I sent him a reply back which he didn't receive! So I then forwarded the test email to my NTFC account and replied to him from that different inbox and account and Hey Presto it arrived, and with it the real reason why life has been so difficult for me as a County Councillor for the past 6 months or maybe even longer. You see some kind and thoughtful soul at County Hall had decided off of their own back or with others to blacklist all of my incoming email correspondence to the County Council. Not an IT blip you will understand as emails can only be blocked as either spam, or from a bad IP address or host, or with profanities within the text (This is called the Scunthorpe scenario, for all of you with filthy minds).

So for months, my requests on behalf of constituents have been totally ignored, leading to me being bad tempered with staff on the phone having wondered why they had failed to make any progress on my query, My considered comments on reviews and consultations over such important matters as the boundary review, future parking powers, changes to the councils constitution, changes to services including social care, have all gone undelivered, requests and forms sent in for empowerment fund monies all sat in a deleted box in the Council not processed. No wonder officers looked at me gone out when I got angry at having to repeat myself verbally when asked for my views on Council issues, and not once did anyone say, "we never received your email Councillor"
So just how am I supposed to feel now? Pleased to discover that I am not losing my marbles after all? No not really, in fact I feel angrier than ever before that an elected member of the Council and the constituents they represent could have been treated in such a fashion, that person or persons unknown have taken it upon themselves to interfere with the democratic process and deny myself and those I serve a voice. I feel embarrassed that my electorate have had to endure poor service and puzzlement as to why their Cllr couldn't get things done for them in the usual and expected fashion. I am furious that the relationship between myself and some officers of the council has been sullied, leading to a mistrust between us as to my opinion or lack of opinion being forthcoming or my insistence that they were not doing their job all because someone decided that Tony Clarke should be silenced.
I will of course deal with what is an insignificant standards board complaint by a Tory Cllr in a future blog posting, once the truth has outed, and the mistakes in the report corrected, but there is a certain irony that it was this complaint that would eventually be the matter on which a far more serious abuse of local government power has been revealed.
I doubt for one minute if any who know me would think I could ever be silenced, and it is in some ways complimentary to think that some will still try, but I believe that I am owed a full answer to how this could have happened who was responsible and what were the reasons behind the action. Whilst I await the outcome of the inquiry , I must take some solace in discovering that age has not truly caught up with me yet and that if I am still annoying someone to the point of them taking such crass actions then I must still be doing something right along the way.
As NCC has discovered hundreds of your e-mails then its clear several things must happen.
ReplyDelete1.Your comments on various issues must now be considered, and for instance your views on the Boundary report needs to be reported,even if it means delaying that report.
2.NCC must ensure that all constituents are given an explanation as to why their problems were delayed.
3.NCC need to issue a statement explaining what has happened and who is responsible.It is not enough that the story appears on this blog-many of your constituents have no access to the technology.
4.It cannot be too difficult to discover who initiated the blocking, after all not too many people work in the IT department, perhaps the Police should take an interest?
I must agree with John Dickie that all of your constituents must be given a full and clear explanation as to how this could have happened to an elected member of NCC. As one of your constituents I feel that if this is shown to have been done deliberately then the person responsible for this should lose their job immediately if NCC wants to keep any credibility with the general public. I also believe that a public apology to your constituents and yourself should be forth coming. I also agree with John Dickie that there may be a legal case here and this should not be overlooked.
ReplyDeleteAs to the future and where you see yourself may I say that it is more important than ever that there are people like you Tony who is willing to ask the questions that the other party’s Chief Whip has told them not to ask? This town if not this Country needs people to stand up often in a crowd totally alone and ask the questions that cause the truth to come out and be heard.
I must agree with John Dickie that all of your constituents must be given a full and clear explanation as to how this could have happened to an elected member of NCC. As one of your constituents I feel that if this is shown to have been done deliberately then the person responsible for this should lose their job immediately if NCC wants to keep any credibility with the general public. I also believe that a public apology to your constituents and yourself should be forth coming. I also agree with John Dickie that there may be a legal case here and this should not be overlooked.
ReplyDeleteAs to the future and where you see yourself may I say that it is more important than ever that there are people like you Tony who is willing to ask the questions that the other party’s Chief Whip has told them not to ask? This town if not this Country needs people to stand up often in a crowd totally alone and ask the questions that cause the truth to come out and be heard.
Thanks Guys, at the minute they are suggesting that my email provider may have been blocked by their anti virus software, but this doesn't stand up to any scrutiny.
ReplyDeleteMy email is tony.clarke@email.com provided by mail.com the 4th largest email provider in the world with 200 million users just behind Hotmail, Yahoo and Gmail. To suggest that NCC's or anybody elses software would block all such addresses is ludicrous.
They also forget that I use my email across the world and even with the UK Parliaments server, so why would NCC's anti virus software be the only one in the world to block me?
My IT contact tells me that the block must have been administered manually as my provider, isp and content was all safe. The anti virus block theory would also block any outgoing mails and I was receiving them from NCC, hence them asking my opinion on matters and my responses back not being delivered.He also told me that they are duty bound to monitor any such blocks.
I have therefore now asked the following questions:
Date and time of the block being applied
Person responsible for authorising the block
Number of individual .email accounts blocked
Details of other mail providers which have been blocked
Details of how this block was monitored
Reasons why outgoing mail to my address was not blocked
Reasons why no one monitoring or supervising the system identified that tony.clarke@email.com was not a legitimate address given the authority has a member with the same name.
Copies of any emails referring to my account and or my email sent or received by the IT department in the last 12 months
Perhaps the NBC are also blocking Councillors emails?
ReplyDeleteI sent one to the Deputy Leader of the Labour Group & Shadow Cabinet Member for Environment about a public safety issue, 20 days have passed still no reply?
[Yawn] You have to ask: who cares????? This isn't news, it's a like a really rubbish diary.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous, you are a really crap person, if democracy isn't served what future is there?
ReplyDeleteGary
Tony, I am really bothered by this, it must be sorted. I have just mailed them as to why they haven't published the March over £500 spending, I am, as a employee fully aware that they don't publish every thing over £500.
ReplyDeleteAlso, why isn't LGSS registered at Company House, is this another cover up going in under another name? All the other companies they have created are there.
Gary
At least on here all views are welcome, and published! and no electronic messages are blocked.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment Gary, its a pity that the anonymous poster above you isn't as confident enough in his own opinion to print his name too!
Regards
Tony
Publisher in Chief of the Really Rubbish Diary
Hi Tony, I would print all my name but for working for NCC!
ReplyDeleteGary
No problem Gary, I just appreciate your willingness to post
ReplyDeleteHappy to put my name, just like your other loyal readers. It's... Gary.
ReplyDeleteGary
You now sound like that poor kidnapped soul from the Fools and Horses Christmas Special
ReplyDeleteStrange, there is a imposter Gary on here! you won't get me on the computer at 03.28!
ReplyDeleteGary
Ha! LMFAO Tony!!!!!!!!! Nice to see you've a sense of humour!!!!!!!
DeleteGary
Yet another posting by our intrepid man of the people Councillor Clarke, keep up the great work sir and take the sad troll,s comments as a compliment, you have obviously got under his yellow livered skin.
ReplyDeleteNot sure I understand this Bollocks! Gary
DeleteYeah thanks for your transparency, Anonymous. Nothing cowardly about you. Or should that be... Tony. Only joking. Thanks for the reply, mate. I honestly a big fan.
ReplyDeletePS What do you call somone who trolls someone who is already trolling a troll??? Good one, eh? LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gary
Maybe you would like to have a word with Adam Simmonds who is leaving his post as NCC Asistant Director of Democracy to concentrate on his appointment as the Conservative candidate for the Police Commissioner.
ReplyDeleteYou mean the Adam Simmonds who resigned from his non political appointment last Friday to represent the Tories after previously telling us all he was now non political when resigning his post as a party political assistant to become an assistant director? Me thinks you may have something there patriot but of course he couldn't possibly comment.
ReplyDeleteAdam Simmonds, the non political assistant director with no portfolio who didn't write the political speeches for Norman (sir) Hacker for the last 18 months or so?
ReplyDelete