"Hi my name is Professor Pongoo, I am a six foot tall penguin, the cousin of Pingu and I have come from another planet to warn people about Climate Change. I am standing as your candidate for Edinburgh Council and if elected I pledge myself to attend every council meeting as your elected penguin"
An unusual, but not altogether bad platform to fight an election campaign on I guess, and it so nearly worked. Pongoo with 444 votes was well ahead of the Lib Dem candidate 370 and also the Green Party candidate on first preference votes but in a seat determined by the alternative vote he eventually lost out to the big three in Scotland (well big two and a tiny bit) The SNP, The Labour Party and the Tories.
It was brave attempt for the Independent candidate, and the man inside the suit Mike Ferrigan, and a warning to us all that apathy and a total loss of faith with our current political system is still a leading issue even amongst the minority 30% of the population who can still be bothered to vote.
Pongoo's near miss was for me the highlight of a Local Election night that overall was a predictable and completely mind numbingly boring affair all round. OK the Labour Party won a whole shed load of seats lost in previous elections and in fairness they won more seats than even the Tories who were talking their chances up, had predicted, The Tories lost seats and the Lib Dems flat lined. And as the local government pendulum swings against the government in situ we should by now be used to such changing fortunes.
Meanwhile down in the smoke Boris held off Ken on a "We know he is a Tory, but we quite like having a Mayor who is as mad as a goose" vote.
Proof positive if you like that even the big three revert to farce when their core vote abandons them. In fact I dare say if Boris had himself taken advise from Pongoo and dressed up in a penguin suit then his vote would have been even higher, but then if Ken had donned a Salamander Lizard outfit? who knows the Labour Party might have took the mayoralty as well?
But a 30% turnout! just where are we all heading? I recently researched party membership of the big three in Britain over the last 60 years and found that the Tory Party can lay claim to the highest ever party membership figures of the three main parties (2.9m in the 1950's) followed by Labour (1.1m again in the 50's) The Lib Dems of course are a modern phenomenon but in their various guises they always struggled to reach such dizzy heights (highest found figure 145,000 1980 SDP)
So how does that all fare against today's party membership statistics, surely given the massive rise in population since the 1950's the number of our citizens actively involved in political life must still be quite high? Not a chance, the last estimated figures in 2010 have the three party memberships as follows;
Conservative: 210,000 Labour: 190,000 Lib Dems: 45,000
That's less than 500,000 members between the lot of them! or an even more alarming way of presenting it just 1.5% of the UK population between all three of them. And if you really want a sense of the size of the decline then look no further than a comparison with UK membership of the three biggest Conservation and Wildlife charities. The National Trust alone has more members than all three of the political parties combined total, and when added to memberships of the Wildlife Trusts and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds then the Big Three nature lovers at 5.5m members trump the party hacks by more than 5m paid up subscriptions. Maybe the RSPB vote explains Professor Pongoo's success?
Coming back to local politics, you also have to remember that we currently have 469 local councils in the UK as well as two parliaments (England and Scotland) and an two Assemblies (Wales and Northern Ireland) so given that you have to be a party member to stand for election then roughly around 30% of those combined party members would be current candidates and 10% (1 in 10) will end up being elected. You should also worry that all three of the parties amongst their membership include a proportionately high number of eccentric individuals (best written about in another blog)
New parties are also not making any in roads into the public interest. Of the most successful in recent years and also the most vile UKIP have only ever reached membership high figure of 26,000 in 2003 (now down to 16,000) and the BNP a high of 9800 in 2008 which most believe has now fallen to well below 4000
So to put it bluntly we have one of the lowest political participation rates in Europe, our political system and its parties are tired, irrelevant to most peoples everyday lives and less attractive to most voters than a six foot man dressed up in a penguin costume. One in ten of those in a party will be elected and three in ten stand for election. These are chosen by the other seven in ten who inevitably include amongst their number the politically naive, the retired and inactive and a small bunch who it is best to simply describe as socially odd, nice to be with but frankly as mad as a box of frogs
I am a socialist, those are my political ideals, I am now after 5 years out in the cold able to rejoin the Labour Party if I so wished, they along with the Greens are currently the only parties I could ever entertain signing any membership form for in the future. But before I took such a massive step I would need to know, what were their parties plans for re-engaging with a British public who are currently completely turned off to UK politics.
I don't want a debate with the 30% of the 30% who bother to vote in Local elections, I want to engage with the 70% who don't bother to vote at Local Elections and or say they never will or never have voted.
And fun as it may seem, I don't want to have to dress up in a penguin suit in order to do it.
Hello Tony - interesting blog and as ever, plenty to chew over for readers of your postings.
ReplyDeleteInteresting view on the problems of political party membership. Could I be as bold and ask you to further your thoughts on what the answer is not just the problems?
CWF a good start would be for the shackles to be taken off from local Party branches making them more accountable to their localities rather than to the central London based head offices. Party members of all three parties are not allowed to have or form an opinion these days, they are simply expected to go along with the policy and opinion handed down to them from on high.
ReplyDeleteI also believe that local residents groups and associations can replicate what the trade unions did in the late 1800's when they created the Labour Party by creating local peoples party's politically linked or not but answerable to their local members.
I also think that people in a consumer age want something back for their membership, and anyone in Amnesty or the RSPB or any of the successful pressure groups feels attached and gets a service, gets a monthly magazine and feels connected.
We also need more people in all party's prepared to speak the truth and break the mould of pointless glib soundbite answers to every question asked. Imagine for one minute if a national politician said "You know, what I think we cocked this whole thing up and we need to get a grip and make sure it doesn't happen again" or turn round to a news reporter and say "Are you just going to continue to act glib and ask pointed questions all night, and dumb down the whole debate, or have you got anything sensible to ask or say?"
Tony, BNP membership did actually reach the 14,000 mark, but I like many others, have since left that particular vessel.
ReplyDeletegood to hear it patriot, now try and steer clear of similar seperatist circuses. The politics of multi culteralism and the united combined efforts of the masses to challenge the elite are the only sustainable way forward for our people.
ReplyDeleteHi Tony
ReplyDeleteIt's much easier to infuriate people than to enthuse them.I'm afraid that is a fact.Low turnout at local elections (approx 30%) contrasts with 60% at Generals. There are 2 factors with a bearing on this:(i)a lot of people shrug their shoulders about things and are, on the whole, prepared to accept things.This may not suit the political class - which includes Independents - but if people were really annoyed they would turn out to vote to make a protest. And(ii)they are bright enough to know that the country has become so centralised that only a change at Westminster can change the course of the ship of state.Evidence for this : disgust with Labour in 1979 (whether you like it or not) and election of Mrs.Thatcher.Note : not a one off - she was re-elected 3 times, and was the longest serving Prime Minister of the 20th century.Radical change from Butskellism (1945-79.Radical agenda, largely endorsed by a terrified Labour Party that accepted the new political consensus to get elected in 1997.(Blair/Mandelson).
My hope is that the Localism Act and the new planning framework may herald a real shift in power and decision making to local communities.But for this to have any real effect, we need local tax raising powers, well beyond Council Tax.That is way off, admittedly. However, it remains a destination.We are on a journey and, like Martin Luther King said, we may not get there in our lifetime.
Michael Clarke
Thanks Michael, I agree that hunger for change always inflates turnout, but often (as in Thatchers election) leads to tyranny. But turnout is only one part of the picture, party membership and political engagement are the more worrying factors. As for whose lifetime we will see change in? perhaps the English spring is closer than we all think?
ReplyDelete